9/11 Pentagon Consipracy theory

[YankssRule]

Hey all..a friend of mine just sent me these to sites. Thoughts???

Go to this one first:
www.freedomunderground.or...n.php#Main (http://www.freedomunderground.org/memoryhole/pentagon.php#Main)

then read this:
www.abovetopsecret.com/pa...dence.html (http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html)


Janet

[CaptainStark]

Nope.

The security camera clearly showed a 757 skipping off the ground only feet from the lower windows of the Pentagon. I even saw a picture of the front windscreen with a big dent in it from the hijacker who was seated behind it.

Most of the wreckage entered the building and went several layers inside. The ground impact may have violated the structural integrity of the plane prior to impacting the building with little or no evidence on the ground. The actual entry site (I believe) was through the pier that held up those collapsed floor sections. No bizjet could have penetrated all the building rings that this aircraft did. It's a simple case of mass times velocity.

The sound of the American flight hitting the North tower sounds unlike the noise we associate with jet airliners too. It's because we aren't used to the sound they make at full throttle and 40 knots beyond redline.

Ray:ray

Ray

[YankssRule]

:tiphat Ray:

:type I'm right there with you. I believe a plane did go throw the Pentagon. I was just curious to know what other thought of this theory.

Janet :peace

[sengelin]

I am amazed at how many people still take this conspiracy theory semi-seriously. You don't even need to see the video-tape of the plane hitting the building to know that the hole in the Pentagon is perfectly consistent with being hit by a large airliner. All you have to do is think about it in context of what you saw with your own eyes on 9/11.

We all watched the World Trade Center fall. We all watched the plane hit the side of Tower Two, live on TV. We all saw the hole that it left. The hole was remarkably small, narrow, and knife-shaped for a 200+ ton airliner. Yet we all know that a 200+ ton airliner made it because we saw it with our own eyes. I remember thinking that I couldn't believe how little damage had been done to the building when I saw it happen.

The skin of the World Trade Center was made of thin steel and a whole lot of glass, yet it bore very little evidence, other than fire, that a plane had hit it.

The Pentagon, by contrast, has an exterior wall made of three feet of high-compression concrete reinforced with steel. It was designed to withstand missile strikes, yet, it still bore a distinct hole where the fuselage penetrated clear through the first ring of the building. The wings apparently folded up along side the fuselage, or disintegrated, as the plane went through. That's not at all implausible, considering the strength of the Pentagon's walls.

Even if you still doubt it, there are videos of the plane hitting the Pentagon and countless photos of recognizable debris all over the lawn.

For a very thoughtful response to the Pentagon conspiracy theory, take a look at:

Snopes Urban Legends (http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm)